Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessops
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete and replace with Jessops (photographic retailer) - though these requests are I think better listed at requested moves. WjBscribe 05:02, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Need to delete to move Jessops (photographic retailer) in here, as this is an unnecessary disambiguation page; Instead the reference for Jessops of Nottingham should be an {{otheruses}} or similar Ratarsed 11:42, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- delete per nom. David Underdown 12:44, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Probably OK to cover this with speedy G6, and so tagged. EliminatorJR Talk 15:33, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom - Zeibura S. Kathau (Info | Talk) 16:16, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The page should be kept either as a disambiguations or a redirect page as it is a notable company in the United Kingdom. Canderra 17:09, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The point of deleting the disambiguation page is so that the current article at Jessops (photographic retailer) can be moved to Jessops, and the link to the John Lewis article inserted at the top. There'd be no point turning it into a redirect. - Zeibura S. Kathau (Info | Talk) 17:24, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This action requires the original article's deletion? Can't it simply be over-written? If not then I withdraw my original vote. Canderra 17:28, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It has to be moved rather than copy pasted to preserve its page history, that's all. - Zeibura S. Kathau (Info | Talk) 17:33, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This action requires the original article's deletion? Can't it simply be over-written? If not then I withdraw my original vote. Canderra 17:28, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The point of deleting the disambiguation page is so that the current article at Jessops (photographic retailer) can be moved to Jessops, and the link to the John Lewis article inserted at the top. There'd be no point turning it into a redirect. - Zeibura S. Kathau (Info | Talk) 17:24, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and move per nom. --Guinnog 17:43, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and move per nom, the other entry on that page just isn't notable enough. Ben W Bell talk 18:03, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep 217.43.221.48 14:58, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Why's that? -- Ratarsed 14:46, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.